The coverage of gokken op voetbalwedstrijden champions league the newly announced bill for the reactor in Helsingen Sanomat, Finlands usually staid and respected daily paper of record, took a positively jeering parry at the cost overrun, and summoned comparisons to the worlds most expensive casinos, luxury hotels and even the.
Helsingen Sanomats Tuesday article did not report any further delays to the beginning of commercial operation of Olkiluoto 3, In fairness, the paper pointed out that Canadas Darlington Nuclear Generating Station located on the northern shore of Lake Ontario and running.
Virginie Mou"Laiho, vice country director and communications director of areva Finland, said the cost comparisons to skyscrapers and luxury hotels drawn by the newspaper provided an inaccurate illustration of what is at stake in the building of the EPR.
But even so, he said, the experience of some 60 years of building nuclear power plants worldwide should lead to more accurate cost estimates than the nuclear industry can produce.Furthermore, Darlington only blew its original budget parameters by twice its initially announced cost, according to the March 4, 1993 edition.This leads to further uncertainty about the growing costs of the nuclear industry, because there are no cost analyses for dismantlement and safe storage of the resulting nuclear waste.The project, which as of last year this time was already running 7 billion, or 5 billion, over its originally estimated price tag of 3 billion, sheds a dim light on the practicality and expense of the first-of-its kind reactor, which has been touted.The Olkiluoto 3 EPR fulfills the worlds highest safety requirements and will produce electricity for Finland for 60 year, Mou"Laihos statement continued.For the accountants running the book on Olkiluoto 3, there is bound to be hell to pay eventually.What becomes especially troublesome, he added especially with all that concrete involved is how much it will cost to dismantle these nuclear facilities, including Olkiluoto.Candu reactors, similarly ran into insatiable cost overruns.This means they two reactors at Darlington can produce the slightly more power than Olkiluoto 3 for a discount of a billion Euro.Areva/Finland, the consortium building the reactor, responded in a statement that called the comparisons drawn on by Helsignen Sanomat unfruitful.Access Denied your access has been blocked due to possible malicious activity originating from your IP address.It is evident that building a nuclear power plant is more complex and has related expenses, particularly linked with nuclear safety, that are incommensurable with conventional civil construction works, Mou"Laiho said in her emailed statement.Roughly, each of Darlingtons reactors cost some.5 billion and produce 878 MWe of energy a piece, according.Bøhmer said the tremendous skyrocketing of building nuclear reactors was attributable to the fact that reactors require tons and tons of concrete.Marina Bay Sands Hotel and casino, the worlds most expensive building, which, on its completion, weighed in.2 billion.Woes continue to mount around the construction of Finlands Olkiluoto 3, the new generation.If you believe your IP address has been blocked inappropriately please submit the form below with all required fields to request removal of your IP address from our Intrusion Prevention System's block list.
But as time has shown, the building of any nuclear power plant is always a gamble, making the newspapers comparison quite apt.
Nils Bøhmer, Bellonas general director and nuclear physicist called the new round of cost overruns absolutely insane and questioned why such lavish sums could not be expended in the field of far cheaper renewable and alternative energy sources.